Sunday, October 11, 2026
the thing
Saturday, October 10, 2026
now for something else.
gimme shelter
Endure hardship as discipline; God is treating you as his children. For what children are not disciplined by their father? If you are not disciplined—and everyone undergoes discipline—then you are not legitimate, not true sons and daughters at all. Moreover, we have all had human fathers who disciplined us and we respected them for it. How much more should we submit to the Father of spirits and live! They disciplined us for a little while as they thought best; but God disciplines us for our good, in order that we may share in his holiness. No discipline seems pleasant at the time, but painful. Later on, however, it produces a harvest of righteousness and peace for those who have been trained by it. - Hebrews 12: 7 - 11
Friday, October 9, 2026
essense
We have this idea that we're so fragile and under immense pressure and on the verge of breaking, and that's all just a story that we tell ourselves. Your inner self, your soul, your spirit is not just strong, it's unbreakable, unquenchable.
As Emerson wrote, The soul will not know either deformity or pain.a kind of hangover
ebb and flow
Thursday, October 8, 2026
making a mark
Wednesday, October 7, 2026
the voice
Tuesday, October 6, 2026
would you fight for my love
deferrance satisfied
Monday, October 5, 2026
different reactions
new eyes
Sunday, October 4, 2026
Monday, September 28, 2026
the key of change
I remember when I was studying English at uni and I was really getting into literature. I read and studied Frankenstein, Wuthering Heights, Middlemarch, Portrait of a Lady, Passage to India, and lots of other great literature. Some film versions of Frankenstein and Wuthering Heights came out and I was so excited to see them. I imagined that they would do justice to these great novels. Again and again I was disappointed, until I came to the conclusion that it can't be done - you just can't make a great film of these great novels.
I still think there's some truth to that. You can't really do justice to a novel in film or a TV show, at least in the way that I once thought. A film is never going to do justice to what I find in these novels. What I've discovered through watching some really good shows that are based on some great novels, is that you have to change the story radically in order to do justice to it.
You have to make something of it - something new. For example, at the center of the TV show, The Man in the High Castle, is a subversive film but at the center of the book, is a book. In the TV show, Brave New World, pretty much everything - at least all the action of the story - is different from the novel. Some key things are the same, like the names of some characters, but more importantly, what is the same between the two is the issues and the context, the dilemmas, the human story. In order to tell that same story in a TV show and in our era, you have to change it. You have to get the idea - or your own sense of the idea - and then make a TV show about that idea.
hold fast
Another reason we don't perceive the speeds we're actually going at is because they remain consistent. It's like when you're in a car or a train that's travelling at 80 kmh. You can read or play a game or eat. You can sleep even though you're moving at 80 kmh. But if the vehicle were to suddenly stop completely, you would fly forward and get injured.
perspective
sin tax
Sunday, September 27, 2026
æsthetic
What interests me about Andy Warhol and some other artists is the creative audacity they manifest. They do something real and interesting in the artistic realm.
just
Subtle effects can have major consequences, especially when it comes to the mind and things that affect the mind. That's something I've really come to appreciate anew as I have tapered off benzos.
I'm down to less than 2 x 2 mg of Valium a week now, most weeks. Most days I take .25 x 2 mg, which works out to 1.75 x 2 mg a week. So, you'd think that the amount of Valium in my system would mean that I don't really need it anymore and it wouldn't affect me much anymore, but no, that's not the case. I'm getting close to the end. As of this month - September 2026 - I started to have some days when I didn't take any Valium at all. Passing through that barrier was exciting. For the first two weeks of this month, I had 2 days each week of no Valium, but then, towards the end of those 2 weeks, it hit me really hard. It wreaked havoc with my sleep and mental health, and I still haven't recovered - still struggling. So, I've gone back to .25 x 2 mg a day, for the moment, and when I've stabilized, which should be soon I think, I'll have another go at some zero days.
I've also rediscovered the effects of caffeine. For a long time I only drank decaf, but then lately I've been experiencing a really oppressive kind of fatigue. The combination of being so exhausted and not being able to sleep is exquisite torture. So, I had the idea of trying a decaffeinated coffee, maybe 2 or 3 times a day. I wasn't sure if it would work, but I wanted to give it a go, and it turned out to be really effective. I don't know if it was just psychosomatic, but the first sip I felt a difference, felt re-energized. Just having that little extra bit of control again, is very encouraging. It's intoxicating, but in a good way.
path taken
The first time I went to university was in 1986. I was doing a combined commerce/ law degree, but I didn't end up finishing it. I chose commerce because I really liked economics when I studied it in high school, but I bombed out of commerce. I failed all 3 of my commerce subjects in that first semester. The kind of economics I liked was macroeconomics but none of the courses in first year commerce were about that. There was accounting, microeconomics and quantitative methods.
So, after that I transferred to doing a combined Jurisprudence/ Law degree, which was basically a lot of law, with a minor stream of some other subject of my choice. I ended up choosing economic history.
That first time, I got through 2 years of studying full-time but then ended up doing some other things - working, travelling, etc. Then, in 1996 I went back to uni and this time I was doing a combined Arts and Education degree majoring in English and History. Again, it didn't work exactly as planned and I didn't finish the education degree but I did finish the Arts degree.
I still worked in education. I did a lot of English tutoring, and in 2009 I did my Certificate IV in Training and Assessment, then I worked in vocational education as a trainer and developer for around 7 years.
Saturday, September 26, 2026
book to screen
for knowledge to count
Friday, September 25, 2026
forgive
Thursday, September 24, 2026
modern media
unhappy returns
Wednesday, September 23, 2026
do it
Tuesday, September 22, 2026
breaking barriers
the anxiety in the anxiety of influence
Monday, September 21, 2026
bird set free
dialectical croonings
reason to believe
Sunday, September 20, 2026
what is modernism?
give
the harder the better
Saturday, September 19, 2026
knife behind back
Friday, September 18, 2026
the power of apathy
With depression and anxiety, the more you react to them, the more imposing they become. You have to learn to say, yes, I feel this way, but it's OK, and also, over time, I will feel better. There's no way you can feel better immediately, but you can work on thinking in a healthier way, and in time, your feelings will follow.
What happens is that we get distressed about how we feel, and we dwell on it and our fear and aversion of how we feel, and the way that we feel trapped with it, makes something out of it. For example, say you get pins and needles and a feeling of numbness in your hand when you get anxious. That's actually something I have experienced. So, I notice that my hand feels numb, and I'm like, oh no, here comes a panic attack. That anxiety and the fact that I'm hyper focused on the symptom makes the symptom worse, or seem worse at least, and then other symptoms pop up, which causes more anxiety which causes more symptoms which causes more anxiety, and it just spirals.
One of the main things that helped me get my panic attacks under control was learning not to react. Panic attacks rely on your fear. They're so horrible that, at the first sign of one, you freak out and your system is flooded with adrenalin, which fuels the panic attack, but as you begin to get your anxiety under control, you learn that you don't need to fear panic attacks. So, when you feel one coming on you say, ok, I'm going to slow down my breathing (which is another powerful way of treating anxiety) and I'm just going to push through it. The first couple of times may still be difficult, but if you keep practicing this you will overcome panic attacks. Basically, when you feel a panic attack coming on but it's not a big deal anymore, it's not a panic attack.
AI use and abuse
Thursday, September 17, 2026
genius working holiday
I've only read one of D H Lawrence's books. He was absolutely a genius. The book of his that I read is Kangaroo, which is regarded as an Australian classic even though Lawrence wasn't Australian. That tells you how good it is. It's such a masterful evocation of Australia, and more specifically, Australia in the 1920s. I read it for a course on Australian modernism.
It's all the more impressive considering how he wrote it. He wrote it in Australia. He completed the first draft in 6 weeks while staying in Thirroul, on the south coast of NSW, and then revised it over a few months. A lot of the reflections on the Australian landscape in the book are fueled by Lawrence's experience of the landscape in Thirroul and the more political elements of human interaction come from conversations and interactions Lawrence had with people in Sydney.
telling the truth
Is there a kind of writing that is more suitable than others for expressing the truth? Wordsworth probably would have said poetry meets that standard. In his 'Preface to Lyrical Ballads', he wrote:
The Man of science seeks truth as a remote and unknown benefactor; he cherishes and loves it in his solitude: the Poet, singing a song in which all human beings join with him, rejoices in the presence of truth as our visible friend and hourly companion. Poetry is the breath and finer spirit of all knowledge; it is the impassioned expression which is in the countenance of all Science.
I wonder if anyone still thinks like that. I think a more modern view would be that the novel is the best way to express the truth, or maybe creative non-fiction.
Wednesday, September 16, 2026
their own language
progress goals
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
apprecisation
Recently I bought a copy of Samuel Beckett's three novels, in one volume - Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable. He originally wrote them in French and later translated them into English, and they were hugely influential over later literature, both French and English.
I kind of just wanted to have a copy of the novels because of their standing as literature. It's a separate thing from my appreciation for the text itself.
aesthetics
science fiction
There's a mistake that is often made where people think that, because someone has expertise in one area, their views about other issues should carry more weight. This often happens with writers. When someone is a successful novelist, they will often start commenting on different cultural and social issues, and they're taken very seriously.
A similar thing happens with technology. The views of people who have been in upper-level management of tech companies or who were involved in the development of cutting-edge technologies, about anything related to those technologies, are taken very seriously, when actually, about those particular issues, they aren't any more knowledgeable than anyone else. There was that case where someone who worked closely with AI thought that it had developed consciousness, and people took his view seriously because of his real expertise in AI.
Then, recently, there have been experts predicting that AI will kill off humanity within a few years unless regulations are put in place to curtail its development. I'm not saying that there aren't issues there. I'm saying that, just because someone has worked closely with AI, doesn't mean they know what's going to happen in the future. This has always happened around technology. There's always a fear of what could happen, but is putting the brakes on development because the technology could be misused, the solution? I don't think so.
More importantly, the idea that there is something malevolent at the heart of technology that we need to nip in the bud before it gets too powerful and there's not stopping it...that narrative is not new at all. At least since the 19th century there has been that fear of the unknown potential of science and technology and there have been stories and views about the threat they represent, and with progress, those fears proved unfounded. Fear is never going to tell you the truth.

















































